CCAFS-ILRI Workshop on Communications and Social Learning in Climate Change
8-10 May 2012 ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa
Working group: Time scales
This group was represented by: Ben Garside.
(During the 'foundational' workshop of May 2012, five priority change areas were identified, which later formed a major part of the CCSL agenda - as mentioned in a synthesis paper published after the workshop. This page relates the unpolished discussion notes from the working group that defined the agenda for this change area, for the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security [CCAFS] and more broadly for the CCSL group. Each of these five change areas remains an important aspect of the CCSL strategy).
Climate change = long-term problem that needs adaptation by stakeholders now
How do these relate to the time horizons of different actors?
How can long-term considerations be brought into short-term concerns and action?
Theory of change
Why? Adaptive capacity will be limited if long-term changes are not considered
How? Long-term considerations should be addressed through short-term incentives of relevance and interest to stakeholders for their engagement
Example of a tool to enrich existing projects through social learning processes and make them more effective by connecting short-term relevance to longer term understanding of climate change and ability to adapt
Time horizons evaluation tool
Activities (sequenced): Commission research into time horizons building on state of the art (risk management, psychology, behavioural economics)
Specific scale / who is targeted: CCAFS site + sub-national/hub level (coffee under pressure) + national (scenarios)
Where (optional): Makueni, Nyando
Who plays what role: Topic experts, project organizers, stakeholders
Time needed to do it: 6 person/months research, 1-3 person/months testing + travel
Funding ballpark: 100K USD
Social differentiation: Target different groups
Incentives framework
Activities (sequenced): Commission research building into incentives based on state of the art (psych, eco, risk + development social science)
Specific scale / who is targeted: Retro-apply to scenarios, coffee under pressure, on-going risk management projects
Where (optional): CCAFS target regions
Who plays what role: Topic experts, project organizers, stakeholders
Time needed to do it: 3 person/months research, 1-3 person/months testing + research
Funding ballpark: 70K USD
Social differentiation: Target different groups
Evaluating change
Activities (sequenced): Applying the tool to evaluate impacts
Specific scale / who is targeted: Previously involved projects
Where (optional): CCAFS target regions
Who plays what role: Topic experts, project organizers, stakeholders
Time needed to do it: 6 person/months research person/months testing + research
Funding ballpark: 60K USD
Social differentiation: Target different groups
Feedback from the peer review group
The scenario should look at short term priorities and needs and link those with longer time adaptive capacity;
Q: You should rephrase the incentive framework, it needs to be clear, incentives should be proactive, people should be motivated enough, have you dealt this issues in your discussions?
A: We have discussed about different stakeholders and different time horizons, the short term needs and the long term need in the time frame, linking the needs and the incentives for bigger picture.
and link those to longer time adaptive capacity;
Aspiration and goals should be looked at for incentives criteria;
You need to expand a bit on the incentive framework.
Previous minutes (from the plenary session)
Climate change is a long term problem that needs adaptation by stakeholders
The response to climate change requires action by stakeholders now, but how do we evaluate this with different horizons, with short and longer term actions?
There is a problem of understanding policy and resource problems.
Activities:
Time horizons evaluation tool
Incentives framework
Evaluating change
Anticipated outcomes:
Projects are better linked to stakeholder needs as well as short/medium term development objectives.
CCAFS-ILRI Workshop on Communications and Social Learning in Climate Change
8-10 May 2012ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa
Working group: Time scales
This group was represented by: Ben Garside.
(During the 'foundational' workshop of May 2012, five priority change areas were identified, which later formed a major part of the CCSL agenda - as mentioned in a synthesis paper published after the workshop. This page relates the unpolished discussion notes from the working group that defined the agenda for this change area, for the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security [CCAFS] and more broadly for the CCSL group. Each of these five change areas remains an important aspect of the CCSL strategy).
See the working group presentations:
Presentation
Climate change = long-term problem that needs adaptation by stakeholders nowHow do these relate to the time horizons of different actors?
How can long-term considerations be brought into short-term concerns and action?
Theory of change
Time horizons evaluation tool
Incentives framework
Evaluating change
Feedback from the peer review group
Previous minutes (from the plenary session)
- Climate change is a long term problem that needs adaptation by stakeholders
- The response to climate change requires action by stakeholders now, but how do we evaluate this with different horizons, with short and longer term actions?
- There is a problem of understanding policy and resource problems.
Activities:- Time horizons evaluation tool
- Incentives framework
- Evaluating change
Anticipated outcomes: